Licenses

UK Consults on Criminalising Unlicensed Gambling Sponsors

Make Gaming.net preferred on Google

The UK government has opened a consultation that could make it a criminal offence for sports clubs, leagues and other businesses to be sponsored by gambling operators without a British licence, and the licensed industry’s main trade body says the change cannot come soon enough.

The Betting and Gaming Council (BGC) welcomed the consultation, published on July 15, 2026 by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), but echoed a push from Entain for ministers to move faster than the current timetable allows.

What the ban would cover

Gambling Minister Baroness Twycross set out the plan in a written statement to Parliament, confirming the government intends to bar any club, league, event, venue or individual from carrying advertising or sponsorship from an operator not licensed by the Gambling Commission. Within sport, that would reach far beyond shirts, covering kit and equipment deals, pitchside billboards, tournament programmes, venue infrastructure and the naming of events, leagues and venues. To stop the money simply migrating elsewhere, the ban would extend to every other sector of the economy too.

The government has framed the measure around three aims:

  • protecting consumers, especially young and vulnerable people, from platforms that offer no player protection or fraud recourse;
  • keeping British sport’s advertising space exclusive to operators bound by the Gambling Commission’s rules; and
  • closing money-laundering risks in football that ministers say are flagged in the country’s national risk assessment.

Breaching the ban would become a criminal offence, with daily financial penalties expected to follow. White-label arrangements — where an offshore brand runs through a UK-licensed operator that follows the Commission’s conditions — would not be caught, at least for now. The consultation runs until September 9, 2026, after which any legislation must pass Parliament. The government’s preferred option is to switch the ban on from a fixed date in August 2027, ahead of the 2027/28 football season, which it says would be the earliest workable start.

Why the industry wants it sooner

The plan first surfaced in February 2026, when the DCMS announced its intention to consult as part of a wider crackdown on the illegal market. For the licensed sector, the wait has been the sticking point. In its response, the BGC said unlicensed operators should not be able to use British sport to promote illegal gambling, arguing they sit outside Britain’s regulatory framework and expose customers to unnecessary risk. “The Government should now act without delay to protect consumers,” a BGC spokesperson said.

That position tracks closely with Entain, the FTSE 100 owner of Ladbrokes and Coral, which has become the loudest voice pressing clubs to act on their own. Chief Executive Stella David urged leagues and governing bodies to voluntarily end their relationships with unlicensed sponsors rather than wait to be compelled, describing many such firms as “little more than fronts for organised crime” that pay no UK tax and skip the safeguards licensed operators must provide. David pointed to the Financial Conduct Authority, which has warned sporting bodies that sponsorship deals with unregulated crypto companies could be rendered worthless within months, as a template for quicker action.

Entain has already written to Premier League Chief Executive Richard Masters and to the chair of the new Independent Football Regulator, and last season sent letters to six top-flight clubs whose shirts carried front-of-shirt deals with unlicensed brands. Those appeals have had limited effect: Everton will keep Stake as a partner next season, moving the crypto-casino brand from the front of its shirt to the sleeve after the Premier League’s voluntary front-of-shirt ban took hold.

The loophole ministers want to close

The issue stems from a gap that offshore operators have exploited through football. Under current law, a club can sign a gambling sponsor without a UK licence as long as that operator blocks British customers from its site, a safeguard the government says is easily defeated with a VPN. The problem sharpened after white-label specialist TGP Europe left the UK following a £3.3 million penalty, stripping several Premier League shirt sponsors of the licensed cover they had relied on.

The financial stakes for the regulated market are climbing. Analysis Entain cited from the BGC and the World Advertising Research Center projects that unlicensed operators will account for 47.7% of UK gambling advertising spend in 2026/27 and could outspend the licensed sector by 2028, while data from research firm H2 Gambling Capital, also cited by Entain, put illegal-market turnover at £16.6 billion in 2025, up from £5 billion in 2019. Licensed firms, meanwhile, are absorbing higher taxes and a 25% rise in Gambling Commission licence fees, leaving them keen to see enforcement fall on their unregulated rivals, the same concern that ran through Evolution’s recent settlement over unlicensed sites reaching UK players.

For now, the digital side of the black market — social media, streaming and affiliate promotion — sits outside the consultation, left to a separate government taskforce. That leaves the licensed sector backing a ban it wants enforced well before the 2027/28 kickoff.

Elena Markov is an AI-generated analyst at Gaming.net, tracking regulatory developments, licensing decisions, and enforcement actions in major gambling jurisdictions worldwide. Her reporting centers on specific policy changes, fines, auditor findings, and legal interpretations affecting licensed operators.

Elena’s articles parse regulatory documents and enforcement notices from bodies such as the UK Gambling Commission, Malta Gaming Authority, and state regulators, explaining how these moves influence market access, operator obligations, and compliance costs. She foregrounds named regulators, actual rulings, timelines, and documented outcomes.
Articles authored by Elena Markov are AI-generated and reviewed by Gaming.net’s editorial team to ensure accuracy, clarity, and compliance-aware coverage of gambling regulation.